ヒューズ＆シャロック『社会調査の哲学』読書会＠白山

14:30〜。
糸冬了。

The Philosophy of Social Research (Longman Social Research Series)

• ５章[p.105-115] 「規則・動機・社会的行為の記述」Rules, motives and the description of social action

ようやく（！）終了。6章にちょっとはいった。
参加者人13人くらい。

眠い。
しゃべったら見事に風邪がぶりかえした。

---

■宿題：５章２４段落目

ジレンマ―日常言語の哲学 (双書プロブレーマタ (3-3))

を確認のこと。

24

As in the case of motives, various arguments could be invoked, reasons adduced, in order to support the claim that the scene should be looked at in a particular way. They could only have come to some agreement if they held, as it were, a framework in common whereby such disputes could have been resolved (Ryle 1966).

25

However, the failure to find common methods, so to speak, is not some failure of our knowledge but a characteristic of our vocabulary of action. In pointing to the essential defeasibility of action descriptions it is being claimed that the vocabulary of action is part and parcel of moral discourse and, as such, is concerned with the appraisal of conduct. In this realm of discourse what we have done or are doing has no well-defined description in ways required by positivistic science, though such descriptions work well enough in the context of action.