〈マクロ社会的〉なるものの文法

昼食。俺がエスノメソドロジー基本文献を地味に勉強するスレ。二周目。

><

1. 「マクロ社会的」現象 [p.30-33]
  • how their properties could be conceptualized / to what their existence actually amounts [p.33]


あれこれの弊害を見るにつけ、「日常的」という表現は、そろそろ使うのをやめたらどうか。とか思ったりもする今日この頃。



2. マクロ現象の「観察可能性」 [p.33-36]

[p.35]

  • selfmembershipping organizations / nonselfmembershipping organizations
    • [ex. SPD, Oxford University] / [ex. gender, nations]
  • social orgnizations of categorical incumbency (の違い)15
  • membership categorization practices16
    ↓以下 MCD の解説
    • サックスの最初の区別: categorization of a person / relevantly correct categorization of a person(s)
      • 例:「論文執筆」場面(or 活動)における自分を「父親」だとカテゴリー化するのは「operationally relevant」ではない。


ていうか「operationally」てなに。


注15)

Categorization and the Moral Order (International Library of Phenomenology & Moral Science)

Categorization and the Moral Order (International Library of Phenomenology & Moral Science)

[incumbency]

  • 義務, 負担; 聖職禄保有牧師の地位[任期]; 〔古〕のしかかる重量(感).

[incumbent]

  • a.義務としてかかる 《on》; 在職中[現職]の; 〔古〕重くのしかかる, 横たわる, 寄りかかる, もたれかかる.
  • n.(英国教会の)聖職禄保有牧師; 在職者 《特に現職議員》.
http://www.sanseido.net/




[p.36] 誰かここ解説して いや、やっぱりいい。

it really isn't 'Jane Doe' calling 'Jeff Coulter' when it is 'Bay Bank' calling me,

just as it really isn't 'Karol Woytyla' qua private citizen

who instantiates Catholicism on those occasions

when the enunciations are formally produced.

Jane Doe, and Karol Woytyla, may say and do a host of things in their lives,

but only on occasions

bounded by specific sorts of rules
do their saying/doings make relevant those categories

such as to instantiate the action of a collectivity.

Armies can plan coups d'état, companies can fix prices, governments can declare wars,
and so forth, only insofar as the practices and praxis-relevant identities of persons,
sometimes few and occasionally many,
are recognizably invocable.
http://www.questia.com/read/109333910

このあたりは『社会的システムたち』の(邦訳ISBN:4769907427/ISBN:4769908083) [313-6] / [536-8] あたり

構造と過程の分化

と比較して読まれるべき議論ですな。