ルーマンの論文「個人なるものの個体性」では、スアレスへの参照が議論のキモに効いているわけです。ところでその箇所で参照されているのは、（著名なる５章ではなく）６章なんですよね。なんでかな？ ・・・というのを、昔からちょっとだけ気にしつつも放置してあったのですが。
今回、参照箇所を確認してみたところ、なんと「6-6-14」というのは間違いで、この文章が登場するのは「5-6-14」なのでした。とほほほほ...
| ■ルーマンが引用している原文（を含む箇所）： |
■その箇所を含む英訳： |
DISPUTATIO V
DE UNITATE INDIVIDUALI EIUSQUE PRINCIPIO
SECTIO VI
QUOD TANDEM SIT PRINCIPIUM INDIVIDUATIONIS IN OMNIBUS SUBSTANTIIS CREATIS
Substantiales modi quo principio individuentur
14. Dico tertio: modus substantialis, qui simplex est et suo modo indivisibilis, habet etiam suam individuationem ex se, et non ex aliquo principio ex natura rei a se distincto. Declaratur exemplis in unione, verbi gratia, formae ad materiam, vel materiae ad formam, quam suppono ex infra dicendis esse modum substantialem. Item in subsistentia simplici, et idem esset de existentia, si esset modus realis essentiae ex natura rei distinctus ab illa. Itaque constat unionem quam nunc habet anima mea ad meum corpus esse unam numero et individuam, tum quia est quid reale et a parte rei existens, et distinctum ex natura rei ab anima; tum etiam quia differt numero et non specie a modo unionis alterius animae ad corpus suum; habet ergo suam individualem differentiam; ergo et intrinsecum aliquod principium seu fundamentum eius; hoc ergo principium dicimus nihil aliud esse posse nisi entitatem ipsius modi, qualiscumque illa entitas sit. [5-6-14 : Opera omnia p.185]
Francisco Suárez, Disputationes Metaphysicae
|
Metaphysical Disputation V:
Individual Unity and Its Principle
SECTION VI
FINALLY, WHAT THE PRINCIPLE OF INDIVIDUATION IS IN ALL CREATED SUBSTANCES
The Principle whereby Substantial Modes are Individuated
14. I say thirdly: The substantial mode, which is simple and in its own way indivisible, also has its individuation from itself, and not from some principle distinct ex natura rei from itself. This is made clear, for instance, in the union of form to matter, or of matter to form, which I assume, from what is said below, to be a substantial mode. Again in the subsistence of a simple [entity], and the same would be [the case] concerning existence, if it were a real mode of essence distinct ex natura rei from it. Accordingly, it is certain that the union which my soul has to my body now is numerically one and individual, both because it is something real and existing in reality and distinct ex natura rei from the soul, and also because it differs numerically and not specifically from the mode of union of another soul to its body. Therefore, it has its individual difference and, therefore, [it has] some intrinsic principle or foundation of that. Therefore, we say that this principle can be nothing other than the entity of the mode itself, of whatever kind that entity may be. [p.131]
Suarez On Individuation - Metaphysical Disputation V
|
「distinct ex
natura rei」というのは「実在に即した区別」というやつでございますな。
